Split-off package config from release note packages

Callum Lerwick seg at haxxed.com
Sun Apr 2 02:44:06 UTC 2006


On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 02:18 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> My personal view: ATrpms is trying to add value to fedora (and RHEL),
> and I wonder why there have to be so many alienations towards
> ATrpms. People of the fedora community complain about market loss to
> Ubuntu due to non-coherent community of fedora and semi-official
> statements like the one in the wiki just divide the fedora community
> further.

Stop replacing core packages. That's all you have to to. If you have a
problem with a core package, file a bug report. Don't replace it.

And move what you can into Extras.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20060401/b3d921e0/attachment-0002.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list