yum + mulitarch + updates
dragoran at feuerpokemon.de
Sun Apr 2 07:13:24 UTC 2006
Nicholas Miell wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 08:28 +0200, dragoran wrote:
>> I have noticed that when I have package foo-1.0.i386 installed and some
>> other (x86_64) repo has foo-1.1.x86_64 yum updates foo and removes the
>> i386 one.
>> (livna mplayerplug-in was it here).
>> Updates should not be crossarch a i386 package should only be updated to
>> a i386 one (same for x86_64).
>> Any reason for doing this? Or is this a bug thats needs to be filled?
> And when OpenOffice finally gets a working AMD64 version, I fully expect
> the AMD64 packages to replace the i386 packages when I do a yum update.
> Packaging is hard; let's go shopping!
thats a special case...
but updating crossarch without even tell the user may break working
setups very easy
More information about the devel