Why Elektra is the wrong approach (Was Re: The Strengths and Weakness of Fedora/RHEL OS management)

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Tue Apr 4 19:41:58 UTC 2006


Le mardi 04 avril 2006 à 21:31 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> Le mardi 04 avril 2006 à 15:19 -0400, seth vidal a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 21:09 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > > (why do you think
> > > Red Hat revived Fedora after letting it wither a few years)
> > 
> > umm. what? When did red hat let fedora wither?
> 
> deemphasised if you want to be politically correct (RHL 8 to FC-2 or 3 I
> think) Then the press releases started rolling again and Fedora was not
> the ugly duckling anymore.

Which makes me think (slow thinker that I am) now that this period is
over could we add a Fedora History page in the wiki with the "eat your
brainz" satire ?

Or is it still too early ?

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 199 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20060404/21fb3838/attachment-0002.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list