ipw3945 packaging
Dax Kelson
dax at gurulabs.com
Wed Apr 26 21:42:42 UTC 2006
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 18:18 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> sorry, I'll take it back. I found the article (for German readers):
>
> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/result.xhtml?url=/newsticker/meldung/70092&words=ipw3945
>
> and the quote was from Dax Kelson:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/32622
>
> So, indeed no love for ipw3945.
Correct, my quote was not about the firmware it was:
"It is very disappointing to see this binary user space daemon (that
must run as root, presumably to write into /sys/) requirement. I
recognize that it is a better poison than a binary kernel module."
Basically, I'd rather have a closed userspace app whisper the secret
numbers to the hardware than have a close/binary only kernel module do
the same.
Presumable somebody can sniff out what those secret numbers are (in a
legal fashion) then the someone can fork a new driver that includes that
functionality. Goodbye closed userspace app!
The question is, would Jeff Garzik / Linus accept the forked driver into
the kernel?
Dax Kelson
More information about the devel
mailing list