Collecting and fixing pet peeve bugs

[Hans de Goede]

Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 07:31:53PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> That might be a good idea, or a blocker bug. How do we make sure that
>>>> not too many or too obscure bugs get set to this keyword / blockerbug?
>>>> Just remove abusing bugs?
>>> Yeah, although we'd have to carefully pick the keyword so as to not offend
>>> someone if *their* pet peeve bug got removed.
>> I must say I'm more in favor of a blocker bug (since I'm unfamiliar with
>> the use of keywords)
> 
> I'm not sure a blocker bug is really appropriate, as by definition it's
> unlikely all the dependencies will ever be resolved.
> 

The same goes for the FE review tracker bugs, but those are blocker bugs
and work well.

Regards,

Hans