rpm db problem

[seth vidal]

On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 19:44 +0200, Erwin Rol wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 07:21 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> 
> > > One silly question, didn't rpm start using sqlite?  But the databases
> > > are still BDB?
> > 
> > rpm defaults to bdb use. It _can_ use sqlite. 
> 
> Is there any information on what the pros/cons are of both methods? 
> 

sqlite rpmdbs (for the current config) are about 3x slower, iirc.

-sv