snort inline on Fedora

[Chuck Anderson]

On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:03:48PM +1300, Michael J Knox wrote:
> The suggestion is to point to a set of "real" kernel includes instead of
> RH's glibc-kernheaders package.

Kernel includes should never be used from userspace.

> Has anyone got some suggestions on what should be done about this or how
> to work around it (from a packaging standpoint) ?

If the glibc-kernheaders are insufficient, and snort is sticking to 
documented public interfaces, then glibc-kernheaders should be fixed 
to define those interfaces.