Questioning Pirut

[Rahul Sundaram]

Willem Riede wrote:

> On 02/19/2006 09:29:00 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>>
>> When you mention bugs, I would immediately like to see them followed 
>> bynice  informative bug reports. When you mention UI issues, mockups 
>> wouldbe great  contributions to help in the design of a better UI and 
>> whilehanging out on  #fedora-devel you could always ping and talk to 
>> Jeremyand others over their  plans for Pirut.  Perfectionism is the 
>> root of allevils.
>
>
> Triggered by this thread, I just tried pirut for the first time, and 
> while it  may lack polish, it certainly works. There's two 
> observations that I'll be  happy to turn into bugzilla RFEs if so 
> desired:
>
> 1. the packages added (or in this case removed) apparently are not 
> added to  yum.log - I wish they were;
> 2. I wish the "details" that you've got 15 seconds to look at contain 
> a list  of the packages that are actually going to be added / removed, 
> not just the  ones drawn in for dependencies - I removed "dial-up 
> networking", since I'm on  cable modem I figured I don't need them, 
> and then saw minicom being erased,  which I wanted to keep (but not 
> for dial-up). Easily enough to revert with  yum, but I should have 
> been able to avoid it. 

Ya. Go ahead and file those as enhancement requests.

-- 
Rahul 

Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers