ATrpms and FC5/RHEL5
nphilipp at redhat.com
Tue Jan 3 09:00:52 UTC 2006
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 12:10 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 10:44:36PM -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> > Right, so repository XYZ carries the package ABC, which I need, but
> > since XYZ fosters the repo hell, I shall simply walk away whistling.
> The correct thing to do would be to:
> 1) Complain to the repo maintainer that replacing Core (and Extras?)
> packages is a big no-no.
> 2) Find out why said repo maintainer feels the need to replace said
> 3) Submit a bug in Bugzilla to solve repo maintainer's need
> 4) Wait for bug to be resolved. Wait for repo maintainer to rebuild
> packages that don't conflict with Core/Extras anymore.
4a) Wait for bug to be CLOSED/WONTFIX because maintainer's needs would
e.g. mean possibly violating patents.
Unless everything has plug-ins or some other witty scheme to handle that
comes up, we will likely see people rebuilding core packages with stuff
enabled that we don't.
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp at redhat.com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
More information about the devel