Why not /usr/bin64?

[Rudolf Kastl]

2006/1/17, Michael A. Peters <mpeters at mac.com>:
>
> On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 10:49 +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Actually the only package i know where this would make sense is WINE.
> >
> > 32 bit compiled wine runs 16/32bit win binarys
> > 64 bit compiled wine runs 64 bit win binarys
> >
> > actually though i dont think its worth to have another binary dir.
> > just packaging it to another %{name} is sufficient in my eyes.
>
> That's what pango does for pango-querymodules
>
> It has %{_bindir}/pango-querymodules-{32,64}
>
> If this is needed for wine, perhaps an RFE for that needs to posted in
> the Extras wine component.
>
> >
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list



its needed once i got it building for x86_64 completly and i am in contact
with the maintainer for wine in extras. Just wanted to actually state the
obvious since there are cases where 32 bit and 64 bit binaries make sense to
be parallel installed.

regards,
Rudolf Kastl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20060117/c8ae874b/attachment-0002.html