Kernel timers

Callum Lerwick seg at haxxed.com
Thu Jun 15 07:32:04 UTC 2006


On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 23:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Tickless operation. We need to abandon the timer tick.

Interesting, what would this mean for low latency operation?

It seems we in the Media Production SIG aren't going to be able to get
away with not using a 1000mhz kernel very easily, and I suppose now is a
good a time as any to bring it up with the core kernel people. See my
Rosegarden review request:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20060615/3e0744ff/attachment-0002.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list