games user and group

[Michael Thomas]

Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:31:06PM -0800, Michael Thomas wrote:
> 
>>Two packages that I recently submitted for review ('rogue' and 'ularn')
> 
> 
> I was always under the impression rogue (and rogue clone) didn't meet the
> Fedora licensing requirements as it was non-commercial only

That's true for Angband, but rogue 5.4.2 is very BSD-ish:

http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/roguelike/rogue5.4/LICENSE.TXT?view=markup

--Mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3820 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20060228/9becea4a/attachment-0002.bin