Mirrorlist missing mirrors?

[Robert Spanton]

I think some of the fedora mirrors haven't caught up yet. Maybe someone's
waiting for them to catch up a little.

Rob Spanton

On 3/21/06, Avi Kivity <avi at argo.co.il> wrote:
>
> Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> > On 3/21/06, Ralph Angenendt <ralph+fedora at strg-alt-entf.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think so.
> >>
> >
> > Or perhaps...the single mirror listed in the mirrorlist is acting as a
> > redirect at the http server level... redirecting you to some other
> > http mirror based on http server logic which we can't easily evaluate
> > via normal client interaction... essentially short-circuiting the
> > normal mirrorlist behavior we've grown used to in previous versions.
> > I don't have a clear understanding as to expected behavior now and I
> > need an explanation from the mirror infrastructure developers as where
> > things stand. Something has certaintly appeared to have changed, but
> > without understanding the change it will be difficult to troubleshoot.
> >
> >
> no. we have a single mirror active, and doing a 'yum upgrade' is an
> exercise in futility as after 4-5 headers the mirror will reject the
> connection due to overload and yum will exit saying no more mirrors are
> available.
>
> the corresponding file for FC4 has all the mirrors listed, someone just
> needs to go and update it.
>
> --
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20060321/42b75088/attachment-0002.html