Can we make readahead more robust to package updates?
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Tue Nov 14 03:23:24 UTC 2006
Arjan van de Ven (arjan at fenrus.demon.nl) said:
> I really like this idea; it's a simple "cat" and it can be done at a
> time where latency doesn't matter... (even in cron.daily)
>
> Oh... this opens more options. This also allows the "sort by
> blocknumber" to be done at this point and taken out of the critical
> latency part......
>
> great idea!
Of course, that then makes shutdown take twice as long.
What do you do if you have a box where readahead makes boot slower?
Bill
More information about the devel
mailing list