A couple of serious questions

[Arthur Pemberton]

On 4/13/07, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:
> Vlad wrote:
>
> > Fedora's attitude seems to be: Forget KDE distro integration, we're
> > not going to bother.
>
> imo, there much more to KDE distro integration than (re)writing qt/kde-based
> config tools, which could be better spent elsewhere, like:
> 0.  general participation in the kde sig(0)
> 1.  many kde wishlist apps/utilities are in need of package maintainers(1)
> 2.  kde spin could use (lots!) more testing/feedback(2)
> 3.  kde-centric fedora documentation (3)
>
> but hey, no one is forbidding anything.  If you see other itches, but all
> means, scratch them!
>
> -- Rex
>
> (0) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE
>
> (1)
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE#head-8482e5f52583617ce25a658ff3bc2e5db431d7c6
>
> (2) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureFedoraKDE
>
> (3) DocsProject: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/Goals


Exactly.Rex had just a lot more eloquently stated what I have been
trying to say. The system-config tools are really a very small issue.
Just go over to kde-(apps|look).org and see how many mor epackages
could be in Fedora.


-- 
Fedora Core 6 and proud