RPM roadmapping
Peter Jones
pjones at redhat.com
Thu Aug 2 17:07:20 UTC 2007
Florian Festi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Small behavior change for obsoletes:
>
> Issue an error if to be installed pkgs are obsoleted by already
> installed pkgs. As obsoleting pkgs are logically newer "--oldpackage"
> should be required to install the obsoleted pkg IMHO. Right now
> obsoleted pkgs are happily installed.
There's an issue here, caused by the fact that obsoletes is not only
used to rename a package when the old one is going away forever (think
fileutils -> coreutils), but also to give a hint of package discovery
when the repo is replacing one package with a different work to provide
the same functionality.
The canonical concrete example here is routing daemons. Once upon a
time we shipped gated. Then it didn't get maintained very well, and
zebra came along. So zebra got "obsoletes: gated". Then zebra didn't
get it's share of maintenance upstream, but gated did. So gated got an
obsoletes on zebra. And now there's a loop.
If the obsoletes don't have version information in them (which is
generally preferred for the rename case), then there's a loop that your
criteria above can't solve.
This is part of why Conary puts packages in revision trees.
--
Peter
More information about the devel
mailing list