Rebuilds needed for Fedora 8

[Jesse Keating]

On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:36:32 -0400
Simo Sorce <ssorce at redhat.com> wrote:

> A way to mitigate the problem is to test that the latest changelog
> entry actually contains the full NVR (with no macros) and make so
> that "make tag" will refuse to tag if changelog does not match
> expectations (actually this would help me a lot as I tend to forget
> to fix changelog).
> This way 99% of the cases we should have a consistent changelog.

This would make %{?dist} useless as the idea is that you use the same
exact unchanged spec file across your branches.  Forcing that full nvr
be listed in changelog would mean that every spec on every branch would
have to be edited independently.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070822/4c9c177c/attachment-0002.bin