/lib/lsb/init-functions vs. /etc/init.d/functions in init scripts?

[Jos Vos]

On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 09:29:22AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

> The problem is not the R name, the problem is the useful parts of the
> LSB spec are in a package that pulls a lot of garbage, instead of
> being in a separate package people can require independently.

My comments were not about whether a LSB dependency is good or bad,
but about how to name this dependency *if* we move to using LSB.

-- 
--    Jos Vos <jos at xos.nl>
--    X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV   |   Phone: +31 20 6938364
--    Amsterdam, The Netherlands        |     Fax: +31 20 6948204