util-linux missing from build root

[Patrice Dumas]

On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 06:39:00PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Thursday 30 August 2007, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> > If a Makefile uses it to install info files, it must be a BR. Else it
> > might happen that a missing install-info results in missing info
> > files.
> 
> The same thing can be said of just about every feature that is optional in 
> upstream Makefile/configure etc.

No, it is different. In fedora info manuals are always welcome,
and texinfo is widespread. However it may be considered broken to 
have  missing install-info results in missing info files. In 
that case not having info in the buildroot would help finding the
issues.

Maybe we could add info to the minimal buildroot, remove it, then
rebuild everything and see if a lot of packges broke. We could do that
for all the utilities, but for info it may make more sense.

--
Pat