Mock: loss of login shell
Till Maas
opensource at till.name
Wed Dec 19 21:22:23 UTC 2007
On Mi Dezember 19 2007, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:00:10 +0100
>
> Jos Vos <jos at xos.nl> wrote:
> > I think mock is wrong. It's obvious that the devel packages assume
> > developers (like package builders, either human or not ;-)) run the
> > /etc/profile.d scripts. The same holds for some JVM's, IIRC.
>
> How does this work though when installing the -devel packages? Are you
> expected to log out and log back into your shell to actually do
> something useful? That doesn't seem right to me.
This is how it works with every package that drops something
into /etc/profile.d. Why is it not right for -devel packages?
Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20071219/d681089e/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list