Wiki Migration

[Karsten Wade]

On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 18:47 -0600, King InuYasha wrote:
> I was aware of that, which is why I suggested Enano CMS. It is a
> hybrid of a wiki and a CMS, implementing literally the best of both
> worlds.

Is it truly a wiki or does it just have a wiki-syntax-like editor
capability?

A wiki finds its success in being open and easy to edit.  It is the
easiest method to scratch an itch.  This is where our wiki
implementation has suffered the most (IMO.)

I could see a CMS and a wiki engine integrated, in terms of using the
same account system and having a method to move content between the two
faces.  But once you put that content under management, it is no longer
the flexible content of a wiki.

- Karsten

> On Dec 20, 2007 6:00 PM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote:
>         On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 09:23 -0600, King InuYasha wrote: 
>         > If we do decide to move to a CMS
>         
>         
>         A CMS solves a different set of problems than a wiki.
>         
>         The core of what makes a CMS useful (workflow and management
>         of content
>         over time, levels of control (ACLs) for certain content) is
>         anathema to 
>         what a wiki is (fast changes, many hands involved, rapidly
>         moving
>         content through time.)
>         
>         There is no reason we cannot have both.  It is why daMaestro
>         is rolling
>         out Plone for docs.fedoraproject.org.
>         
>         
>         - Karsten
>         --
>         Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr.
>         Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
>         Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
>         gpg key : AD0E0C41
>         
>         
>         --
>         fedora-devel-list mailing list
>         fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
>         https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> 
> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-- 
Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20071220/8e425f04/attachment-0002.bin