Broken deps in the stable release are not acceptable

[Brian Pepple]

On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 18:43 +0100, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> I just noticed that nobody sent out a FESCo Meeting Summary for 
> 2007-09-27[1].  There, we approved 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LubomirKundrak/SecurityUpdateProcessDraft 
> so the Fedora Security Response team would have to approve it before it 
> gets released as a security advisory.
> 
> [1] At least there's a log at 
> http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/fesco/FESCo-2007-09-27.html

Also, a meeting summary:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SteeringCommittee/Meeting-20070927

Later,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20071229/ec18296c/attachment-0002.bin