Smolt from behind a proxy (Re: Smolt: firsboot revisited)

Leszek Matok Lam at Lam.pl
Wed Feb 14 18:50:58 UTC 2007


Dnia 14-02-2007, śro o godzinie 19:01 +0100, David Nielsen napisał(a):
> Smolt is doubleplus good, I vote yes.
I don't know nice 1984-ish word for "not so good", but:

Can Smolt work from behind a proxy server, faking the User-Agent?
Because, you know, I've tried to register some machines from a real
production environment, with no luck. setenv http_proxy doesn't work,
probably because our proxy rejects most of UA-s (or because Smolt
doesn't honor http_proxy at all).

Lam
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: To jest =?UTF-8?Q?cz=C4=99=C5=9B=C4=87?= listu
	podpisana cyfrowo
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070214/6ffce691/attachment-0002.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list