unfiled merge reviews

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:30:52 +1000
Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I am wondering what to do about former Core packages without merge
> reviews.
> 
> I am aware of a number of i18n (input method) related packages
> without merge reviews (anthy, libchewing, m17n-db, and m17n-lib).
> There are surely more in the distro.  Should merge review bugs be
> opened for them?
> 
> One reason for asking is that I would like to build the above
> packages for EPEL EL-4 and presumably the package need to be reviewed
> for that?
> 
> Jens
> 

Are they just missing merge reviews?  Did they have reviews to get into
Core the first time?  A merge review is only necessary if there wasn't
a review to get it into core the first time (I thought...)

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070717/0a6193f2/attachment-0002.bin