Fwd: Re: film at 11: kernel update breaks udev.

[Bill Nottingham]

Richard Hughes (hughsient at gmail.com) said: 
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 00:55 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > 
> > Argh.  So why _are_ we doing our own special rules instead
> > of using the upstream ones ?  This isn't the only time I've
> > run into something like this with udev. 
> 
> Our udev is about 100x times slower than upstream...

I find it hard to believe it's 100x slower. I've done testing
of it with most of the not-needed-for-booting rules commented out -
execution time only dropped from ~5 to ~3.5 seconds.

Bill