RFR: GIT Package VCS
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Jun 7 18:16:21 UTC 2007
On Thursday 07 June 2007 14:06:10 Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Absolutely -- they have different reasons for wanting this than we do.
>
> Our reasons are:
> 1) Better able to work with upstream
> 2) Better able to rebase our local changes.
> 3) Better able to see how our changes have been modified over time.
>
> However, the solution they arrive at is similar to what we want. That's
> why looking at it is good.
I think it's important to note that having exploaded trees with patch
management doesn't exclude generating a srpm with prestine source +patches to
send into the buildsystem and publish in our source repos. What we're
talking about is making it easier to manage the patches on top of the
prestine source.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070607/16f018de/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list