XULRunner - will be or won't be?
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Wed Jun 27 17:32:35 UTC 2007
Christopher Aillon wrote:
> That makes no sense. Are you seriously telling me that you ratify
> changes that may be sub-par with the intent that they can be changed?
No but policies can be ratified with the understanding that they are not
written in stone.
> Sounds like you need to revise your ratification process (or lack
> thereof) before people should feel comfortable following anything that
> gets "voted" on.
That's a FESCo decision that I am not involved with.
Rahul
More information about the devel
mailing list