Packaging quality, assistance.
Hans de Goede
j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Wed May 9 14:43:51 UTC 2007
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 09.05.2007 14:45, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> How about a tracker bug for each SIG?
>
> Well, we never defined in more detail how Packaging SIGs should work.
> Maybe we should create a small set of guidelines that all SIGs follow,
> to get such questions answered once and for all and a common "look and
> feel". I think we should do that, but don't care enough to do it myself
> ATM. And we'll get the usual yelling "to much bureaucracy" or "that's
> should be the decision of the SIG itself" of course... ;-)
>
A tracker bug sounds like a good idea actually, other then that not too much
rules please. (/me starts yelling: "to much bureaucracy"). Seriously, the Games
SIG works well, really well if you ask me, but I wouldn't want to make what we
do compulsory for other SIGs. Like wise I know the KDE SIG has weekly IRC
meetings, if that works for them fine, but it doesn't sound like something
which I envision the Games SIG doing soon.
But as said a tracker bug, where SIG people can put themselves in the CC, and
where packagers needing help can add there bug, sounds like a good, clean and
simple plan. This same bug could be used by bug reporters who think a bug
warrants the SIG's attention.
Regards,
Hans
More information about the devel
mailing list