SUID to cdrecord and cdrdao

Leszek Matok Lam at Lam.pl
Tue May 22 20:33:16 UTC 2007


Dnia 22-05-2007, wto o godzinie 08:09 -0500, Rex Dieter napisał(a):
> In modern times, k3b's warnings are harmless/bogus.  At worst, suid actually
> makes things *worse*.
Not for real SCSI writers, which actually don't work without it.
Re-adding setuid to cdrecord will fix burning for some (lots?) of
people.

Oh, and I remember a time when setuid really made things worse, because
with it, cdrecord failed to start due to some bug. But that bug was
fixed somewhere in FC5-updates IIRC. No offense, but your claim that
suid makes things worse is, in my opinion, FUD.

Lam
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: To jest =?UTF-8?Q?cz=C4=99=C5=9B=C4=87?= listu
	podpisana cyfrowo
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070522/da4d8b82/attachment-0002.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list