When will be CVS replaced by modern version control system?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 13:16 +0100, Adam Tkac wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:06:26AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:08:19 +0100
> > Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > But I know really better
> > > workflows which cannot be used with CVS.
> > 
> > Can you outline what kind of better workflow you'd like to see?
> 
> I wrote it in previous mail. I like distributed VCS workflow - local
> repository, local braches, local commits etc.

Is that useful with the centralised tasks that distribution building
requires, such as koji?

On the Samba team we are presented with a very similar issue -
distributed VCS systems are very attractive, but we also do a lot of our
QA with a central build farm, which realistically only works for the
centralised modal.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20071108/5cfaa580/attachment-0002.bin