Codec Buddy misleading.

[Josh Boyer]

On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 02:35:35 +0100
Mark <markg85 at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2007/11/10, Alan Cox <alan at redhat.com>:
> > On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 12:56:43AM +0100, Mark wrote:
> > > with the codecs is..?? sounds kinda strange but it does seem to be the
> > > case.. (same case for freedesktop.org)
> > >
> > > so hows that working?
> >
> > SF.net just provides hosting and shelters under the US "hey we just host it"
> > protections
> 
> i still don't see why it can't be hosted on fedora.. i understand the
> patent part but if SF can do it than anyone can right? it's not that
> fedora has more users than sf.net.. i think it's actually the
> opposite.
> 
> I just find it all very strange.. some us sites can host it.. some
> can't.. it's confusing.

If you really want to know the answer to this question, you should seek
out a lawyer familiar with the US laws.  Asking on a developers mailing
list is not a good idea.

josh