Review queue/FESCo after the merge

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 14.11.2007 18:54, Christopher Aillon wrote:
>> It encompasses 
>> several pages, many of the items are duplicated, etc.  It's just unruly.
> 
> +1
> 
>>   And the more packaging guidelines we have, the worse it will get. 
> 
> I think it is time to split some things into "this you must know" and
> "this is written down here so you can look it up if you act in a
> specific area and need guidance"
> 
It's definitely time to organize and split the review guidelines.

Packages should not violate the rules but there are many rules that only 
apply to a subset of packages.  It's not a small task, though.  The 
categories have to be intuitive enough so that if I'm reviewing a python 
web application I know to look in:

General Guidelines
Python Apps
Web Applications
Daemons

(To some extent we already have to do this.  There are, for instance, 
pages for language specific guidelines already.)

-Toshio