Review queue/FESCo after the merge

[Jesse Keating]

On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:59:02 +0100
Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> wrote:

> With the big problem here being not rel-eng nor the rel-eng process,
> but me getting the feeling that investing time in decision making
> discussions is useless, as:
> 1) Things are already pretty much pre-cooked, when you say: "I
> created the proposal after talking to some people". I read "I created
> the proposal after talking to most of rel-eng". Don't get me wrong
> this is a logical thing todo, but if proposals get pre-cooked this
> way and I disagree I get to argue with rel-eng as a whole / as a
> block, since you already have reached a consensus on how things
> should be done, and even though there may have been different
> opinions in the past, everyone has now adjusted his opinion to the
> consensus (which is a normal thing todo for any human).
> 
> 2) Because of 1) mainly I guess I do no get the feeling that people
> are actually listening to me.

No, the people I talked to were mostly packagers, not other rel-eng
people.  I didn't really talk to other rel-eng people until I had the
wiki page up.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20071114/6d64a0c5/attachment-0002.bin