Review queue/FESCo after the merge

[Christopher Aillon]

On 11/15/2007 06:24 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
> On 15.11.2007 12:41, Christopher Aillon wrote:

>> Then we should consider updating our guidelines.  This brings up a good 
>> point, too.  If a given package guideline exists to work around bugs 
>> like this in the future, the guideline really must reference the bug # 
>> so it can be easier to revisit at a future date.
> 
> Agreed, albeit I'm not sure if the exact bug # is needed -- the
> information "need in FC > foo and RHEL > bar" is the important one. And
> maintaining that properly is more important due to EPEL, as we'll still
> have to deal with EPEL for EL4 for some years.

Well for bugs that aren't yet fixed, we need the number.  And a 
reference to the guideline from the bug.