Suggestions for F9

[Trever L. Adams]

On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 07:53 +0000, Keith Sharp wrote:

> I agree that a CalDAV compliant calendaring server would be a great
> addition to Fedora, but is the Darwin Calendar Server the best one to
> focus attention on?  As far as I am aware there are at least three other
> servers we could consider:
> 
> 	http://www.bedework.org/bedework/
> 	http://chandlerproject.org/
> 	http://rscds.sourceforge.net/
> 
> I am not following development of any of these, so I cannot comment on
> which would be best for Fedora, but it would be worth doing a review
> before focusing on one implementation.
> 
> Keith.
> 

Keith,

I had seen these before. I do not think I want chandler or rscds. The
later doesn't fully implement the protocol yet. It may never do so.
Chandler seems much too heavy.

Bedework may be a win. It may actually be better than Darwin Calendar
(which is what I suggested).

Anyone have any ideas on which would be best?

Trever

--
"Life is what happens to you when you're busy making other plans." --
John Lennon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20071118/d35e9f87/attachment-0002.bin