System-config Reworking Proposal

Nils Philippsen nphilipp at redhat.com
Mon Nov 19 16:55:12 UTC 2007


On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 10:33 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 7:49 AM, Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> wrote:
> > For my tools (-date, -nfs, -samba, -services, -users), just being able
> > to edit files is also not sufficient. Often these tools don't edit files
> > themselves but use e.g. chkconfig or libuser, partly it isn't even known
> > whether local files are changed or some objects in an LDAP directory.
> 
> Well I was considering that the doCommand, doCommandWait to take care
> of that. Am I underestimating that need?

That would work for chkconfig, but not libuser. I won't resort to
calling luser{add,mod,del} ;-).

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp at redhat.com
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
 Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."  --  B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011




More information about the devel mailing list