FESCo meeting today at 20:00 UTC!

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:26:02 +0100
Christopher Aillon <caillon at redhat.com> wrote:

> While I was unable to attend at this time anyway, I am very much
> annoyed at the lack of notice from a global perspective.  It is not
> unreasonable for someone to make a 9pm meeting.  It *is* unreasonable
> to expect someone to be reading mail during dinner hours to find out
> about it. The reason that the meeting was rescheduled was because of
> a U.S. specific holiday, and in the process, made it very difficult
> for non-Americans that wanted to attend to do so.  We didn't push
> back because we deemed the topics of enough importance.  Which
> underscores the importance for giving people fair chances at
> showing.  Do we seriously need to institute a policy for a minimum
> amount of notice with meeting schedule changes?  Or can we start
> thinking like a global distribution?

There was a poll site set up for who could make what meeting times.  A
time was picked that had the most people available marked, and those
people were specifically contacted again to make sure they could make
it.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20071120/7b7ec624/attachment-0002.bin