Exclude Requires for some archs
Till Maas
opensource at till.name
Tue Sep 11 21:44:50 UTC 2007
On Di September 11 2007, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> When doing this please also consider Secondary Archs.
I try to consider everything that is properly documented. I do not even know,
how secondary archs use Fedora, e.g. do they need rebuilds of packages to
obtain changes or do they use specs directy from the cvs.
> what archs does it make sense to have vbetool on?
I do not know, I guess every arch that supports real-mode video BIOS codes.
Debian provides only packages for i386 and x86_64 according to
packages.debian.org, so maybe it does not work for other archs. I do not know
and I do not have the means to test this. In case there is a hidden koji
setup with secondary arch builders, where I can submit srpms to test whether
a package compiles, I will send my packages there and add the required
ExcludeArchs/%ifnarchs where needed.
Btw. if you know more about secondary archs, maybe you want to check, whether
the requires for radeontool in pm-utils is also a problem.
Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070911/1c9fd70f/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list