Package EVR problems in Fedora 2008-08-01
jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Aug 1 23:42:54 UTC 2008
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 18:23 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Normally, messages from <buildsys at fedoraproject.org> that I get are various
> build-related stuff just for my package, and I filter them in their own
> bucket. These new EVR validator messages also carry the same return address,
> but are not regarding my package. Does it make sense to use the same From:
> address for stuff that's not necessarily related to your packages?
Hrm, I'm using the same address to send individual messages to people as
well as the report message to the list. There are a couple addresses we
have to use, one is rawhide@ and the other is buildsys at . Sending from
rawhide@ didn't make much since to me since this covers more than just
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080801/f7f3de7e/attachment.bin
More information about the devel