Package EVR problems in Fedora 2008-08-01
Sam Varshavchik
mrsam at courier-mta.com
Sat Aug 2 01:00:06 UTC 2008
Jesse Keating writes:
> On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 18:23 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> Normally, messages from <buildsys at fedoraproject.org> that I get are various
>> build-related stuff just for my package, and I filter them in their own
>> bucket. These new EVR validator messages also carry the same return address,
>> but are not regarding my package. Does it make sense to use the same From:
>> address for stuff that's not necessarily related to your packages?
>
> Hrm, I'm using the same address to send individual messages to people as
> well as the report message to the list. There are a couple addresses we
> have to use, one is rawhide@ and the other is buildsys at . Sending from
> rawhide@ didn't make much since to me since this covers more than just
> rawhide.
Do you set the To: header for individual messages? If so, I'll just filter
based on the To: header.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080801/cace31cd/attachment.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list