Revert curl change made for flash
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at gmail.com
Tue Aug 12 13:46:13 UTC 2008
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 14:42 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 09:35 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 16:00 +0300, Nikolay Vladimirov wrote:
> <snip>
> > > The change just provides some backward compatibility. It's minimal.
> > > I really think it's not important why the change was made. Since it
> > > doesn't break anything and it doesn't waste disk space. It may be
> > > useful for some dead opensource projects that use the older version.
> >
> > There are better ways to do this. Providing a compat-curl package is
> > the proper way. The way it was done now is just a hack with the sole
> > intention of making flash work again.
>
> A compat-curl project that would contain duplicated/unmaintained code?
> What's the point of this since libcurl didn't break ABI, and only
> changed soname?
What's the point of adding it at all then? If the ABI didn't change,
then apps can just rebuild against the newer libcurl.
> This is getting a bit too far.
I don't think it is. But if I'm overridden by FESCo, I won't continue
to make a fuss.
josh
More information about the devel
mailing list