libgnutls-openssl and real openssl conflict

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Tue Aug 26 18:57:22 UTC 2008


Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
> Still we need to tackle this before it does become a bigger problem, 
> sofar I've seen very little attention for this thread, which is sad as 
> this is a *real* issue. So far only gkrellm seems to have been used by 
> people who also use nss_ldap, but sooner or later slrn or one of the 
> others will hit the same problem, and if more and more apps are moved to 
> these openssl compat libs then the problem becomes really large!
> 

+1

Especially since Fedora is supposed to drive adoption of nss and the nss 
compat libs to aid in FIPS-140 compliance for downstream distros, this 
problem will only get bigger.

-Toshio


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080826/28655c77/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list