Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14

David Huff dhuff at redhat.com
Mon Dec 1 21:39:21 UTC 2008


Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 17:37 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> Explain how you think the broken deps checker would be broken!
>> The package _is_ in the ppc64 tree, isn't it?
>>
>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/10/ppc64/appliance-tools-003.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
>>
>> Btw:
>>
>> $ rpm -qp --qf '[%{exclusivearch} ]'
>> appliance-tools-003.9-1.fc10.src.rpm 
>> i386 i486 i586 i686 pentium3 pentium4 athlon geode x86_64 ppc alpha
>> sparc armv4l
> 
> Looking at the spec itself, I see:
> 
> ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha sparc armv4l noarch
> 
> I think that 'noarch' is throwing mash off when it's trying to determine
> if a noarch package is suitable for an arch.  Please remove that and try
> again (trying it in rawhide should be suitable to test mash before
> pushing an update).
> 
> 

If I take out noarch in the ExclusiveArch list the build will fail:
"error: Architecture is not included: noarch"

more info:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=968280

-D




More information about the devel mailing list