More PATH fallout. Who decided this was a good idea?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 11:51 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Sunday 07 December 2008 11:31:54 Enrico Scholz wrote:
> > Both 'vipw' and 'ldapadd' are official and documented tools to manage
> > user database.
> 
> vipw I believe is forbidden due to its ability to circumvent auditing of user-
> subject binding. 

Perhaps I'm a bit slow this morning, but vipw is forbidden but
vi /etc/passwd isn't?

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20081208/9c0253f5/attachment.bin