The looming Python 3(000) monster
Simo Sorce
ssorce at redhat.com
Mon Dec 8 22:19:26 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 10:47 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 12:35 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> >
> > I just don't get why any sane person, especially anyone familiar with
> > computer languages, would ever want to give something that is not the
> > same the same name. Does anyone know how the developer(s) manage this
> > themselves? I have to think they are keeping multiple concurrent
> > versions installed (and that that is the only reasonable approach).
>
> I'm pretty certain that if you look at any language, they've all faced
> similar scenarios, major version upgrades that may in fact not be
> forward no backward compatible. People have dealt with it and moved on.
> No language is perfect.
Never seen C/C++ break backward compatibility on a scale like Python 3.0
will.
And they are compiled, where the impact is 100 fold less than for
interpreted languages ...
I would personally strongly consider having 2.x and 3.0 parallel
installable ...
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
More information about the devel
mailing list