Making updates-testing more useful

[Seth Vidal]

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:

>> I think the idea is good. I don't think it helps us to store more
>> information in PK, though.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> If we're going to be storing where a package is installed from. It should
>> probably be in rpm.
>
> We can't easily do that though, can we?  Given that the same binary RPMs
> that are in updates-testing today will be in updates tomorrow without
> changing...

which is, of course, the problem.

-sv