Coordination of updates and reading of bodhi comments

[Orion Poplawski]

Jesse Keating wrote:
> Here is another example where maintainers need to coordinate more and
> pay attention.
> 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-10000
> (rpcbind-0.1.7-1.fc9) went into Fedora 9 updates testing on 11-22.  On
> the 25th bodhi feedback showed that this requires selinux changes.
> 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11122
> (selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9) went into Fedora 9 updates testing on
> 12-10.  This was the build to fix rpcbind.
> 
> On 12-10 rpcbind was submitted for stable.  On the same day, bodhi
> feedback requested that this update not go out until the matching
> selinux-policy went out to stable.
> 
> On 12-11 rpcbind went into stable.

Yeah, this is what prompted my earlier post.  This also makes me wonder 
why I bother running updates-testing on some of my machines.  Seems like 
half the time I report an issue, the update gets pushed to stable anyways.


-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion at cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com