Git has too many freaking dependencies

[Arthur Pemberton]

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> wrote:
> Bill Crawford wrote:
>  > On 15/02/2008, Adam Jackson <ajackson at redhat.com> wrote:
>  >
>  >> Is it insane to propose that metapackages must be explicitly named as
>  >>  such?
>  >
>  > You're not wrong.
>  >
>  > +1 for "git-suite" ...
>  >
>
>  +1 and then rename git-core to just git!
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Hans


Not to bicker of the potential naming, but how about just calling it
git-meta so there is no ambiguity.

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )