Git has too many freaking dependencies
Denis Leroy
denis at poolshark.org
Sat Feb 16 10:51:05 UTC 2008
Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Friday 15 February 2008, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>
>> Not to bicker of the potential naming, but how about just calling it
>> git-meta so there is no ambiguity.
>
> I think there's plenty of ambiguity in "git-meta". If the intent is to
> install all git-* with this, call it "git-all", "git-everything" or just drop
> the whole metapackage and set up a git comps group.
+1
More information about the devel
mailing list