Auto rebuild release bump issue

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Sat Feb 23 01:20:20 UTC 2008


On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:44:42 +0100
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> wrote:

> And still nobody has said what script was used to bump the spec files.
> The one in cvs/fedora originally came from either notting/sopwith and
> was improved for the fedora extras mass-rebuilds. It could be
> enhanced to support the jpp scheme and also add a
> "bump-least-significant" fallback for any "invalid" versioning
> schemes. But if a different and secret script is used, that's not
> helpful.

I used the one that was mentioned on list very recently, from
cvs/fedora/rebuild-scripts.

Most the jpp packages I looked at seemed fine.  Which ones didn't get
bumped right?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080222/95f5de8c/attachment-0002.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list